CRV Token Price in Free Fall

By: bitcoin ethereum news|2025/05/14 00:30:07
0
Share
copy
Key Notes Curve Finance suffered a DNS hijack, redirecting users to a malicious clone site with a similar setup. CRV token price dropped by over 8%, falling to $0.7274 as traders reacted to the security incident. Technical indicators flash bearish signals, with MACD nearing a negative crossover. Curve Finance, a prominent decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem, is once again under siege, this time from a DNS-level exploit that sent shockwaves through its user base, resulting in a sharp downturn in the price of its native token, CRV. According to CoinMarketCap data, CRV trades at $0.7303, down almost 7% in the past 24 hours and is retesting the 20-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) at $0.7074. DNS Compromise Triggers Panic Late Monday night, Curve Finance confirmed a critical security breach involving its domain curve[.]fi. Late last night, the curve [.] fi domain was compromised at the DNS level. This exploit redirected traffic to a malicious IP not associated with Curve Finance. No smart contracts or internal systems were breached—the protocol itself remains fully operational and secure. User... — Curve Finance (@CurveFinance) May 13, 2025 The attacker manipulated the DNS records, rerouting users to a malicious website that mirrored Curve’s legitimate interface but contained nefarious scripts designed to trick users into unknowingly approving token transfers. “The DNS incident involving Curve Finance reflects a broader issue across the industry,” the project stated in an official post, highlighting the rising frequency of infrastructure-targeted attacks in the crypto space. Fortunately, Curve’s core infrastructure, including its smart contracts and internal systems, remains uncompromised. “User funds are safe,” the team reiterated, assuring users that the breach was isolated strictly to the front-end layer. This latest attack mirrors a previous DNS hijack in 2023, which led to over half a million dollars in losses. Technical Analysis: Bearish Clouds Forming The Bollinger Bands on the chart below show that CRV has pulled back from the upper band ($0.8018) and is now testing the middle band (20-day SMA) around $0.7080. A breakdown below this level could expose CRV to the lower band support near $0.6141. CRV 1D Chart with BB and RSI. Source: TradingView The MACD Indicator displays a neutral crossover forming, with the MACD line (0.0421) and signal line (0.0422) nearly converging. If this crossover tilts bearish, downward momentum could accelerate in the coming days. If the MACD crosses negatively and CRV loses the $0.7080 support, the token could test $0.61–$0.62 in the near term. On the flip side, if CRV reclaims the $0.75 mark with volume confirmation, the next resistance lies at the upper Band near $0.80–$0.81. Note: this is a sponsored message from our partners BTC Bull Token ($BTCBULL) Turns Into Investors’ Eye Candy Amid hack attempts and a collapsing CRV token, BTC Bull ($BTCBULL) is gathering attention in a hurry with $5.6 million raised in its ongoing presale. The project aims to reward holders through various mechanisms tied to Bitcoin’s price appreciation. The rewards include direct BTC airdrops for holding $BTCBULL in their designated wallets and further airdrops or token burns triggered by $25,000 increments in Bitcoin’s price, with a significant airdrop promised when BTC reaches $250,000. About BTC Bull ($BTCBULL) As per the whitepaper, BTC Bull leverages meme culture and military-themed branding to create an engaging community around Bitcoin’s potential. A significant 10% token airdrop is also planned for early supporters when Bitcoin reaches $250,000. By offering these BTC-adjacent rewards and fostering a strong bullish narrative, $BTCBULL seeks to become a compelling asset for those who believe in Bitcoin’s upward trajectory. Current presale stats: Current price : $0.00251 Amount raised so far : $5.67M Ticker : BTCBULL Chain : Ethereum With just 1 day, 20 hours left until the next price increase, market participants can easily complete their purchase of BTCBULL tokens by visiting the official website of the project and capitalizing on Bitcoin’s growth potential. next Disclaimer: Coinspeaker is committed to providing unbiased and transparent reporting. This article aims to deliver accurate and timely information but should not be taken as financial or investment advice. Since market conditions can change rapidly, we encourage you to verify information on your own and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Cryptocurrency News, News A crypto journalist with over 5 years of experience in the industry, Parth has worked with major media outlets in the crypto and finance world, gathering experience and expertise in the space after surviving bear and bull markets over the years. Parth is also an author of 4 self-published books. Parth Dubey on LinkedIn Julia Sakovich on X Source: https://www.coinspeaker.com/crv-free-fall-curve-finance-dns-record-attack/

You may also like

TAO is Elon Musk, who invested in OpenAI, and Subnet is Sam Altman

Most of the capital invested in TAO will ultimately subsidize development activities that do not provide value back to token holders.

The era of "mass coin distribution" on public chains comes to an end

The market is becoming increasingly intelligent, and they are abandoning ecosystems that rely solely on funding to support false activity. Now, what is being rewarded is real throughput, real users, and real revenue.

Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?

What exactly is RaveDAO? Why is Rave able to rise so much?

1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars

Liquidity saved Polkadot's life.

After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?

The US has taken away Iran’s most important card, but has also lost the path to ending the war

Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions

The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.


There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."


Question One: Is this encryption the same as Signal's encryption?


No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.


In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.


X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.


This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.


The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.


The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.


After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."


From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.


In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.



As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."


Issue 2: Does Grok know what you're messaging in private?


Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.


For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.


This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.


There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."


Issue 3: Why is there no Android version?


X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.


In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.



WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.


X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.


These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.


Elon Musk's "Super App"


This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.



X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.


Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.


The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.


X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.


The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.


Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more