logo

Curve Finance Hit by DNS Record Attack, Warns Users to Avoid Main Site

By: decrypt|2025/05/13 19:15:05
0
Share
copy
Curve Finance Hit by DNS Record Attack, Warns Users to Avoid Main Site "User funds are safe. Curve smart contracts remain secure," the project's team said. In brief Curve Finance's front-end website suffered a DNS compromise where attackers redirected users to a malicious site. The attack involved manipulating DNS records to point to a fraudulent site mimicking Curve's interface with malicious scripts designed to trick users into approving token transfers. This isn't Curve Finance's first security incident. They experienced a similar DNS hijack in 2022 resulting in $570,000 in losses, and faced another exploit in 2023 involving Vyper programming vulnerabilities with estimated losses of $24 million. Decrypt’s Art, Fashion, and Entertainment Hub. Decentralized protocol Curve Finance confirmed Tuesday that its front-end website was compromised, with attackers redirecting users to a fake site. "The DNS incident involving Curve Finance reflects a broader issue across the industry," the project told Decrypt . "In recent weeks, there has been a noticeable increase in attacks targeting the infrastructure of various crypto projects." The exploit redirected traffic to a malicious IP, the protocol said on social media. "User funds are safe. Curve smart contracts remain secure," it added. The incident was first discovered on Monday afternoon, after which Curve Finance issued a preliminary response . While all smart contracts are safe, the domain name points to a malicious site which can drain your wallet! We are investigating and working on recovering the access. No sign of a compromise on our side https://t.co/YUmwtwt5PH — Curve Finance (@CurveFinance) May 12, 2025 Curve Finance later said the breach was "strictly limited to the DNS layer" and did not compromise its core infrastructure. Its security team promptly isolated the issue, initiated an investigation, and engaged with their domain registrar and security partners to address the situation, the project said. Security measures were in place "long before the incident," the protocol added. What happened? According to Curve Finance, attackers manipulated the DNS records to point to an IP address under their control. A DNS record connects a domain name to details like an IP address, helping direct internet traffic. The fraudulent site, which mirrored Curve's interface, reportedly contained malicious scripts aimed at tricking users into approving token transfers to the attackers. "DNS exploits are a form of social engineering at the infrastructure level. Attackers compromise the domain name system,” Meir Dolev, co-founder and CTO of blockchain security firm Cyvers, told Decrypt . If a site's mapping changes due to stolen credentials or a registrar's vulnerability, users may be redirected to harmful servers without realizing it. "These cloned sites can prompt users to connect wallets and approve transactions that drain funds," Dolev explained. "It's particularly dangerous because the average user can't easily tell the difference—they still see the correct URL." The attack doesn't breach the protocol's blockchain, but rather "exploits the trust layer" between the user and a decentralized app's interface. “So long as users interact with Curve directly via verified contract addresses, their funds are likely unaffected,” Dolev noted. Hacking history This isn't the first time Curve has been hit. Back in 2022, Curve Finance suffered a DNS hijack where attackers redirected users from its legitimate domain to a malicious site, resulting in approximately $570,000 in losses. Following the attack, Curve advised users to revoke any suspicious approvals and proposed migrating to the Ethereum Name Service (ENS) to mitigate future vulnerabilities. A year later, Curve Finance faced another exploit involving some Vyper programming language versions and the CRV/ETH pool. The loss across affected DeFi projects was estimated at $24 million at the time. Edited by Stacy Elliott . Daily Debrief Newsletter

You may also like

How to balance risk and return in DeFi yields?

Have these yields ever been reasonable? Have we ever received the compensation we deserve for the risks taken in DeFi, and where should the future spreads be set?

Tom Lee's Ethereum Thesis: Why the Man Who Called the Last Cycle Is Doubling Down on Bitmine

Tom Lee is emerging as one of Ethereum’s most influential supporters. From Fundstrat to Bitmine, his Ethereum thesis combines staking yield, treasury accumulation, and long-term network value. Here is why “Tom Lee Ethereum” has become one of crypto’s most watched narratives.

Naval personally takes the stage: The historic collision between ordinary people and venture capital

Naval personally stepped in as the chairman of the USVC Investment Committee. This SEC-registered fund launched by AngelList attempts to bring top private tech assets like OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI to the general public with a $500 entry threshold. It is not just a new fund, but a structural experi...

a16z Crypto: 9 Charts to Understand the Evolution Trends of Stablecoins

Stablecoins are evolving from trading tools into universal payment infrastructure, and this process is quieter and more thorough than most people expected.

Refutation of Yang Haipo's "The End of Cryptocurrency"

This may be the true test of cryptocurrency. It's not about whether the price has reached a new high, nor about who will achieve financial freedom in the next bull market, but rather whether, after all the grand narratives have been washed away by cycles, it can still leave behind some simpler, more...

Can a hairdryer earn $34,000? Interpreting the reflexivity paradox of prediction markets

Prediction markets are essentially betting on reality, and when participants can access or even influence this path earlier, the market no longer just reflects reality but begins to shape it in return.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more