US Banks “Tanking” Stablecoin Law? Ripple CTO Schwartz Agrees

By: bitcoin ethereum news|2025/05/15 05:45:05
0
Share
copy
Fear has been cited as the main reason why banks may be the main culprit Earlier this month, the GENIUS Act failed to pass a full Senate vote, as the bill didn’t get the 60 votes needed Nine Senate Democrats were against it, along with two of their Republican peers There is a discussion going on among crypto enthusiasts, with the topic being that someone is adamant about tanking the stablecoin legislation. The main suggested culprits are regional US banks, and Ripple’s CTO David Schwartz seems to agree, saying: “That’s what I’m hearing.” Fear has been cited as the main reason why this may be true. Banks fear stablecoins could disintermediate their market share, with critics like Senator Elizabeth Warren proposing amendments to block tech firms from issuing stablecoins. This just highlights tensions between traditional finance and crypto innovation. The notion isn’t anything new, as it’s been talked about before how traditional banking institutions perceive stablecoins as a competitive threat to their dominance in payment systems. This also explains why the stablecoin bill GENIUS Act failed in its recent vote. GENIUS Act One of the main legislations surrounding stablecoins is the GENIUS Act. Short for ‘Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins’, it seeks to regulate stablecoin issuers and integrate them into the US financial system. Two months ago, the GENIUS Act passed the Senate Banking Committee with an 18-6 vote to regulate stablecoins comprehensively. However, earlier this month, it failed to pass a full Senate vote, as the bill didn’t get the 60 votes needed due to nine Senate Democrats withdrawing their support, as well as two of their Republican peers. Some mentioned the insufficient anti-money laundering provisions and potential national security risks as reasons for withdrawal, while other reasons were reports of Donald Trump’s ties to crypto ventures, including a $2 billion investment in a Trump-affiliated stablecoin. Such a turn of events could point to deep divisions and the influence of external factors like the banking sector lobbying. Influence on the Crypto Ecosystem The interplay between traditional banking interests and emerging crypto regulations will likely shape the future of the financial industry. If the GENIUS Act or any similar stablecoin bills pass in the future, it could be seen as a potential disruptor to banks’ traditional financial services. For instance, stablecoins could enable peer-to-peer transactions without the need for usual banking intermediaries. Whatever the case, the sooner this is done, the better it will be for the crypto industry, as clear and fair regulations could bolster investor confidence, while prolonged uncertainty may hinder the growth of the crypto sector. Still, one thing is for sure – the outcome of the GENIUS Act will set precedents for how digital assets are integrated and regulated within the US financial framework. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company. Source: https://coinedition.com/ripple-cto-david-schwartz-supports-allegation-that-regional-banks-are-obstructing-stablecoin-legislation/

You may also like

Particle Founder: The entrepreneurial insights I have gained the most from in the past year

Stop lean startup, stop lightning entrepreneurship, and think carefully about what your product aspirations are.

Huang Renxun's latest podcast transcript: The future of Nvidia, the development of embodied intelligence and agents, the explosion of inference demand, and the public relations crisis of artificial intelligence

The competition in the future is not just about whose model is larger or whose computing power is stronger, but also about who understands the industry better, who can embed AI more deeply into real processes, and who can organize these capabilities into a runnable and scalable system.

OKX Ventures Research Report: AI Agent Economic Infrastructure Research Report (Part 1)

The existing infrastructure is hostile to the Agent economy. Agents can think and act independently at the "capability level," but at the "economic level," they are still locked into infrastructure designed for humans.

The migration of settlement rights: B18 and the institutional starting point of on-chain banks

In the traditional system, banks decide the settlement; in the on-chain system, code begins to take over this responsibility.

From Tencent and Circle: Looking at the Simple and Difficult Questions of Investment

The AI narrative continues to ferment, but the recent performance of related stocks varies, with some in the midst of summer and others as if in winter.

The second half of stablecoins no longer belongs to the crypto circle

What Coinbase doesn't want, Mastercard is eager to buy.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more